UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Identifying Possible False Matches in Anonymized Hospital Administrative Data without Patient Identifiers.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Journal Article
  • Authors:
    Hagger-Johnson G, Harron K, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Cortina-Borja M, Dattani N, Muller-Pebody B, Parslow R, Gilbert R, Goldstein H
  • Publication date:
    08/2015
  • Pagination:
    1162, 1178
  • Journal:
    Health Serv Res
  • Volume:
    50
  • Issue:
    4
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    United States
  • Language:
    eng
  • Keywords:
    Computerized patient medical records, data linkage, data quality, medical errors, Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Data Collection, Female, Health Services Research, Hospital Administration, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United Kingdom, Young Adult
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify data linkage errors in the form of possible false matches, where two patients appear to share the same unique identification number. DATA SOURCE: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England, United Kingdom. STUDY DESIGN: Data on births and re-admissions for infants (April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012; age 0-1 year) and adolescents (April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2011; age 10-19 years). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Hospital records pseudo-anonymized using an algorithm designed to link multiple records belonging to the same person. Six implausible clinical scenarios were considered possible false matches: multiple births sharing HESID, re-admission after death, two birth episodes sharing HESID, simultaneous admission at different hospitals, infant episodes coded as deliveries, and adolescent episodes coded as births. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among 507,778 infants, possible false matches were relatively rare (n = 433, 0.1 percent). The most common scenario (simultaneous admission at two hospitals, n = 324) was more likely for infants with missing data, those born preterm, and for Asian infants. Among adolescents, this scenario (n = 320) was more common for males, younger patients, the Mixed ethnic group, and those re-admitted more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers can identify clinically implausible scenarios and patients affected, at the data cleaning stage, to mitigate the impact of possible linkage errors.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers Show More
Author
ICH Pop, Policy & Practice Prog
Author
ICH Pop, Policy & Practice Prog
Author
Clinical Epidemiology
Author
ICH Pop, Policy & Practice Prog
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by