UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Psychodynamic treatment for borderline personality disorder and mood disorders: A mentalizing perspective
Abstract
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and mood disorders are highly comorbid, and both disorders share important developmental pathways and underlying neurobiological features. This chapter reviews evidence for the overlap between BPD and mood disorders and presents an attachment and mentalizing approach to the conceptualization and treatment of depressed patients and without marked BPD features. We propose that patients with BPD and mood disorders can be situated on a continuum, with four related features distinguishing individuals with depression with, versus without, marked BPD features: (a) the nature of their depressive experiences; (b) the nature of their mentalizing impairments; (c) the presence of insecure, but organized, attachment in response to stress and arousal versus disorganized attachment; and (d) problems with epistemic trust versus epistemic hypervigilance. We outline the therapeutic implications of these views, arguing that treatments that combine a mental representation and mental process (i.e., mentalizing) focus may be most appropriate for patients with mood problems without marked BPD features. Yet, for patients with more marked BPD features, these treatments may be iatrogenic, as these patients may have serious problems in establishing a therapeutic alliance and lack the reflective capacities needed for such treatments. For these patients, a mental process approach that focuses on restoring the capacity for mentalizing might be more appropriate. Preliminary empirical evidence supporting these assumptions is presented.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by