UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/post_award/post_award_contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Regulatory gaze and ?non-sense? phonics testing in early literacy
  • Publication Type:
    Chapter
  • Authors:
    Flewitt R, Roberts-Holmes G
  • Publisher:
    Bloomsbury
  • Publication date:
    2015
  • Place of publication:
    London
  • Editors:
    Hamilton M,Heydon R,Hibbert K,Stooke R
  • Keywords:
    Multimodality, Governmentality, Early Literacy, Phonics, Foucault, Learning, Arts and Humanities(all)
Abstract
In the context of increasing political intervention in early years and primary assessment in England, this chapter discusses how the power of ?highly prescriptive systems of accountability? (Ball, 2013, p173) has drawn early literacy into the state?s regulatory and disciplinary gaze through a process of ?datafication? (Roberts-Holmes, 2014). We examine the disciplinary effects of assessment technologies upon early literacy pedagogy through the focussed perspective of one inner-city primary Headteacher discussing the impact of the statutory ?Phonics Screening Check? (DfE, 2012a). We critique the multimodal design of this assessment tool for 5-6 year-old children in England, and discuss how some practitioners have ?cynically complied? (Bradbury 2013, p124) to new literacy regulations through a process of accommodation and resistance. Whilst the Phonics Screening Check will no doubt disappear in time from early literacy assessment in England, it serves as an example of how discourses of power infiltrate from political ideology to literacy policy and education practice, undermining professional judgement and moulding children's multimodal experiences of literacy in the primary classroom. As education assessment technologies come and go, it is highly likely that teachers? work will continue to be constrained by the political need to produce ?appropriate? data (Bradbury 2013; Roberts-Holmes, 2014). We therefore close the chapter by suggesting that Foucault?s conceptualisation of ?care of the self? (Foucault, 1988) can create spaces for teachers to resist imposed r�gimes of governmental ?truth? and to plan motivating, creative and multimodal activities that nurture young students? long-term engagement with literacy learning.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
IOE - Learning & Leadership
Author
IOE - Learning & Leadership
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by