UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/post_award/post_award_contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Multi atlas-based attenuation correction for brain FDG-PET imaging using a TOF-PET/MR scanner—comparison with clinical single atlas- and CT-based attenuation correction
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Article
  • Authors:
    Sekine T, Burgos NF, Warnock G, Huellner M, Buck A, Voert EGW, Cardoso MJ, Hutton BF, Ourselin S, Veit-Haibach P, Delso G
  • Publisher:
    The Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc
  • Journal:
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Status:
    Accepted
  • Print ISSN:
    1535-5667
Abstract
In this work, we assess the feasibility of attenuation correction (AC) based on a multi atlas-based method (m-Atlas) by comparing it with a clinical AC method (single atlas-based method (s-Atlas)), on a time of flight (TOF)-PET/MRI. Methods: We enrolled 15 patients. The median patient age was 59 years [range 31 to 80]. All patients underwent a clinically indicated whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT (GE Healthcare Discovery 690 PET/CT) for staging, re-staging or follow-up of malignant disease. All patients volunteered for an additional PET/MRI scan of the head (GE Healthcare SIGNA PET/MRI) (no additional tracer being injected). For each patient, 3 AC maps were generated. Both s-Atlas and m-Atlas AC maps were generated from the same patient-specific GE-LAVA-FLEX T1-weighted images, being acquired by default on the PET/MRI scanner during the first 18s of the PET scan. S-Atlas AC map was extracted by the PET/MRI scanner, and m-Atlas AC map was created using a web service tool that automatically generates m-Atlas pseudo-CT images. For comparison, the AC map generated by PET/CT was registered and used as gold standard. Using each AC map, PET images were reconstructed from raw data on the TOF-PET/MRI scanner. All PET images were normalized to the SPM5 PET template, and FDG accumulation was quantified in 67 volumes-of-interest (VOIs; automated anatomical labeling (AAL), atlas). Relative (%diff) and absolute differences (|%diff|) between images based on each atlas AC and CT AC were calculated. FDG uptake in all VOIs and generalized merged VOIs were compared using paired t-test and Bland-Altman test. Results: The range of error on m-Atlas in all 1005 VOIs was -4.99%~4.09%. The |%diff| on m-Atlas was improved by about 20% compared to s-Atlas (s-Atlas vs. m-Atlas; 1.49±1.06% vs. 1.21±0.89%, p < 0.01). In generalized VOIs, %diff on m-Atlas in the temporal lobe and cerebellum were significantly smaller (s-Atlas vs. m-Atlas; temporal lobe, 1.49±1.37% vs. -0.37±1.41%, p < 0.01; cerebellum, 1.55±1.97% vs. -1.15±1.72%, p < 0.01) Conclusion: The errors introduced using either s-Atlas or m-Atlas did not exceed 5% in any brain region investigated. When compared to the clinical s-Atlas, m-Atlas is more accurate especially in regions close to the skull base.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Dept of Med Phys & Biomedical Eng
Author
Metabolism & Experi Therapeutics
Author
Dept of Med Phys & Biomedical Eng
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by