UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Reflections on applying a criteria to evaluate a serious game
  • Publication Type:
    Conference
  • Authors:
    Farrell D, Allsop Y, Shabalina O, Grace P, Malliarakis C
  • Publication date:
    01/01/2015
  • Pagination:
    734, 747
  • Published proceedings:
    Communications in Computer and Information Science
  • Volume:
    535
  • ISBN-13:
    9783319237657
  • Status:
    Published
  • Print ISSN:
    1865-0929
Abstract
Whilst the field of Serious Games is maturing, the problem of how to identify a good game is still unresolved. Several criteria for game evaluation have been proposed and tested by academics but there are few reports academics using other people’s criteria, or of several experts applying the same criteria to a game to see if they agree on the game’s qualities. This paper presents an evaluation of a game that is under redevelopment. A third party evaluation criteria is applied by four independent experts and the results are reflected on by the game’s designer. Where the experts and designer disagree, the reasons are examined. Finally questions are raised about the risks inherent to any distillation of academic theory to practical evaluation tool.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
IOE - Learning & Leadership
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by