Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Changes in the response to magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex following muscle stretch in man.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Journal Article
  • Authors:
    Day BL, Riescher H, Struppler A, Rothwell JC, Marsden CD
  • Publication date:
  • Pagination:
    41, 57
  • Journal:
    J Physiol
  • Volume:
  • Status:
  • Country:
  • Print ISSN:
  • Language:
  • Keywords:
    Adult, Electric Stimulation, Electromyography, Electrophysiology, Female, Humans, Magnetics, Male, Motor Cortex, Muscle Contraction, Muscles, Stress, Mechanical
1. The effect of muscle stretch on the EMG response from the stretched muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex was studied in eight subjects. Muscle stretch was produced by increasing the torque of a motor acting through a lever which was held at constant position by a flexion force of the index and middle fingers. EMG responses were recorded from fine-wire electrodes inserted into flexor digitorum profundus muscle in the forearm. They consisted of a spinal latency component and a long-latency component which could in some subjects be separated into an early and a late phase. 2. In four subjects, four intervals between the stretch and the cortical stimulus were explored using three intensities of cortical stimulation. At all three intensities, when the magnetic cortical stimulus was timed to produce an EMG response in the period of the later part of the long-latency stretch reflex the response was larger than when it was timed to produce a response in the period of the short-latency spinal reflex or when superimposed on the tonic muscle activity used to resist the standing torque of the motor. 3. When the intensity of magnetic cortical stimulation was reduced so that it was just below threshold to produce an EMG response in the short-latency reflex period or on the background tonic EMG activity, it still was capable of producing a response when superimposed on the long-latency stretch reflex. 4. In four subjects the time course of this effect was studied in more detail using only one intensity of magnetic cortical stimulus set to be just above threshold to produce a response in tonically active muscles. The time course of the facilitatory effect was similar to the time course of the later part of the long-latency stretch reflex. From these data it was not possible to determine whether the early part of the long-latency stretch reflex also was accompanied by the facilitatory effect since this component was present in only one of the four subjects. 5. The facilitatory effect persisted after the ulnar and median nerves were totally blocked at the wrist by injections of local anaesthetic. This suggests that inputs from muscle receptors of the stretched muscle contribute to the effect.4=
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
Clinical and Movement Neurosciences
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by