Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Comparing what to what, on what scale? The impact of item comparisons and reference points in communicating risk and uncertainty
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
  • Authors:
    Rakow T, Blackshaw E, Pagel C, Spiegelhalter DS
  • Publisher:
    John Wiley and Sons
  • Publication date:
  • Journal:
    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
  • Status:
  • Print ISSN:
  • Language:
  • Keywords:
    risk communication; uncertainty; prediction intervals; reference-dependent evaluation; evaluability
The mandated public availability of individual hospital’s audit data for children’s heart surgery in the UK creates a challenging scenario for communicating these complex and sensitive data to diverse audiences. Based on this scenario, we conducted three experiments with the aim of understanding how best to help lay people understand these data, and the practical goal of improving the public presentation of these data. The experiments compared different outcome measures for displaying the survival rate (percentage scale vs. the ratio of the predicted/observed rates) and presentation formats (individual hospital vs. all hospitals shown) for outcomes data presented relative to prediction intervals generated by a risk model that adjusts for case mix. Our data highlight how easily inappropriate comparisons can influence evaluations of complex data: for instance, both a survival ratio of 1 and the presence of other hospitals seemingly provided reference points that resulted in inappropriately harsh evaluations of some hospitals. By drawing on evaluability theory, we demonstrate how to enhance people’s understanding of these complex data while also discouraging inappropriate comparisons, which has implications for communicating risk and uncertainty, and for choice architecture design in a range of contexts.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Clinical Operational Research Unit
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by