UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Numerical scoring for the Classic BILAG index.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Journal Article
  • Authors:
    Cresswell L, Yee C-S, Farewell V, Rahman A, Teh L-S, Griffiths B, Bruce IN, Ahmad Y, Prabu A, Akil M, McHugh N, Toescu V, D'Cruz D, Khamashta MA, Maddison P, Isenberg DA, Gordon C
  • Publication date:
    12/2009
  • Pagination:
    1548, 1552
  • Journal:
    Rheumatology (Oxford)
  • Volume:
    48
  • Issue:
    12
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    England
  • PII:
    kep183
  • Language:
    eng
  • Keywords:
    Adult, Antirheumatic Agents, Drug Administration Schedule, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop an additive numerical scoring scheme for the Classic BILAG index. METHODS: SLE patients were recruited into this multi-centre cross-sectional study. At every assessment, data were collected on disease activity and therapy. Logistic regression was used to model an increase in therapy, as an indicator of active disease, by the Classic BILAG score in eight systems. As both indicate inactivity, scores of D and E were set to 0 and used as the baseline in the fitted model. The coefficients from the fitted model were used to determine the numerical values for Grades A, B and C. Different scoring schemes were then compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Validation analysis was performed using assessments from a single centre. RESULTS: There were 1510 assessments from 369 SLE patients. The currently used coding scheme (A = 9, B = 3, C = 1 and D/E = 0) did not fit the data well. The regression model suggested three possible numerical scoring schemes: (i) A = 11, B = 6, C = 1 and D/E = 0; (ii) A = 12, B = 6, C = 1 and D/E = 0; and (iii) A = 11, B = 7, C = 1 and D/E = 0. These schemes produced comparable ROC curves. Based on this, A = 12, B = 6, C = 1 and D/E = 0 seemed a reasonable and practical choice. The validation analysis suggested that although the A = 12, B = 6, C = 1 and D/E = 0 coding is still reasonable, a scheme with slightly less weighting for B, such as A = 12, B = 5, C = 1 and D/E = 0, may be more appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: A reasonable additive numerical scoring scheme based on treatment decision for the Classic BILAG index is A = 12, B = 5, C = 1, D = 0 and E = 0.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by