Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/post_award/post_award_contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
A cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic eradication therapy for management of dysplasia arising in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus in the United Kingdom
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is the first line approach for treating Barrett's Esophagus (BE) related neoplasia globally. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommend EET with combined endoscopic resection (ER) for visible dysplasia followed by endoscopic ablation in patients with both low and high grade dysplasia (LGD and HGD). The aim of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis for EET for treatment of all grades of dysplasia in BE patients. METHODS: A Markov cohort model with a lifetime time horizon was used to undertake a cost effectiveness analysis. A hypothetical cohort of United Kingdom (UK) patients diagnosed with BE entered the model. Patients in the treatment arm with LGD and HGD received EET and patients with non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) received endoscopic surveillance only. In the comparator arm, patients with LGD, HGD and NDBE received endoscopic surveillance only. A UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective was adopted and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on key input parameters. RESULTS: EET for patients with LGD and HGD arising in BE is cost-effective compared to endoscopic surveillance alone (lifetime ICER £3,006 per QALY gained). The results show that as the time horizon increases, the treatment becomes more cost-effective. The five year financial impact to the UK NHS of introducing EET is £7.1m. CONCLUSIONS: EET for patients with low and high grade BE dysplasia, following updated guidelines from the BSG has been shown to be cost-effective for patients with BE in the UK.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Department of Targeted Intervention
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by