UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
A visual quality control scale for clinical arterial spin labeling images.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Article
  • Authors:
    Fallatah SM, Pizzini FB, Gomez-Anson B, Magerkurth J, De Vita E, Bisdas S, Jäger HR, Mutsaerts HJMM, Golay X
  • Publication date:
    19/12/2018
  • Pagination:
    45
  • Journal:
    Eur Radiol Exp
  • Volume:
    2
  • Issue:
    1
  • Status:
    Published online
  • Country:
    England
  • PII:
    10.1186/s41747-018-0073-2
  • Language:
    eng
  • Keywords:
    Arterial spin labelling, Magnetic resonance imaging, Perfusion imaging, Quality control
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Image-quality assessment is a fundamental step before clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance images. The aim of this study was to introduce a visual scoring system that provides a quality control standard for arterial spin labeling (ASL) and that can be applied to cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps, as well as to ancillary ASL images. METHODS: The proposed image quality control (QC) system had two components: (1) contrast-based QC (cQC), describing the visual contrast between anatomical structures; and (2) artifact-based QC (aQC), evaluating image quality of the CBF map for the presence of common types of artifacts. Three raters evaluated cQC and aQC for 158 quantitative signal targeting with alternating radiofrequency labelling of arterial regions (QUASAR) ASL scans (CBF, T1 relaxation rate, arterial blood volume, and arterial transient time). Spearman correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used. RESULTS: Intra/inter-rater agreement ranged from moderate to excellent; inter-rater ICC was 0.72 for cQC, 0.60 for aQC, and 0.74 for the combined QC (cQC + aQC). Intra-rater ICC was 0.90 for cQC; 0.80 for aQC, and 0.90 for the combined QC. Strong correlations were found between aQC and CBF maps quality (r = 0.75), and between aQC and cQC (r = 0.70). A QC score of 18 was optimal to discriminate between high and low quality clinical scans. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed QC system provided high reproducibility and a reliable threshold for discarding low quality scans. Future research should compare this visual QC system with an automatic QC system.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers Show More
Author
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
Author
Brain Repair & Rehabilitation
Author
Brain Repair & Rehabilitation
Author
Div of Psychology & Lang Sciences
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by