Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Toward precision therapeutics: General and specific factors differentiate symptom change in depressed adolescents
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
  • Authors:
    Aitken M, Haltigan JD, Szatmari P, Dubicka B, Fonagy P, Kelvin R, Midgley N, Reynolds S, Wilkinson PO, Goodyer IM
  • Publication date:
  • Journal:
    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Keywords:
    Bifactor models, Depression, Psychotherapy, Adolescent, Psychopathology
Background: The longitudinal course of multiple symptom domains in adolescents treated for major depression is not known. Revealing the temporal course of general and specific psychopathology factors, including potential differences between psychotherapies, may aid therapeutic decision-making. Methods: Participants were adolescents with major depressive disorder (ages 11-17; 75% female; N = 465) who were part of the IMPACT trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy, short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and brief psychosocial intervention. Self-reported symptoms at baseline and 6, 12, 36, 52, and 86 weeks post-randomization were analyzed with bifactor modeling. Results: General p factor scores decreased across treatment and one-year follow-up. Specific Melancholic Features and Depressive Cognitions factors decreased from baseline to 6 weeks. Conduct Problems decreased across treatment and follow-up. Anxiety increased by 6 weeks then reverted to baseline levels. Obsessions-Compulsions did not change. Changes in general and specific factors were not significantly different between the three psychotherapies during treatment. During follow-up, however, Conduct Problems decreased more in brief psychosocial intervention versus cognitive behavioral therapy (1.02, 95% Bayes credible interval 0.25, 1.96). Conclusions: The clinical response signature in this trial is best revealed by rapid reductions in depression symptoms and general psychopathology. Protracted improvements in general psychopathology and conduct problems subsequently occur. Psychosocial treatments for adolescent depression have comparable effects on general and specific psychopathology, although a psychoeducational, goal-focused approach may be indicated for youth with comorbid conduct problems.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by