Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Effect of early vasopressin vs norepinephrine on kidney failure in patients with septic shock: The VANISH randomized clinical trial
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
  • Authors:
    Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N, Perkins GD, Cecconi M, Cepkova M, Pogson DG, Aya HD, Anjum A, Frazier GJ, Santhakumaran S, Ashby D, Brett SJ, Warwick J, Griffiths S, Cross M, Das N, Bellingan G, Beale R, Banks F, Watts T, Andrews P, McAuley D, Collier T, Templeton M, Errington E, Gladas K, Banach D, Kitson D, Matthew-Thomas R, Hauer V, Ochelli-Okpue A, Stotz M, Ostermann M, Lei K, Chan K, Smith J, Shankar-Hari M, Carungcong J, Handy J, Hopkins P, Harris CL, Wade-Smith F, Birch S, Hurst T, Mellinghoff J, Tomasso ND, Ebm C, Iannucceli F, Kirwan CJ, Creary T, Correia C, Prowle JR, Jaques N, Brown A, Walden A, Joscak J, Bangalan J, Tamm T, Snow L, Stapleton C, Pahary SMY, Gould T, Bewley J, Sweet K, Grimmer L, Shah S, Williams S, Pulletz M, Golder K, Bolger C, Salmon K, Skinner B, Vickers E, Scott M, Rose S, Lamb N, Mouland J, Bullock L, Bland M, Harrison-Briggs D, Wilkinson K, Krige A, Ward G, Ting J, Bassford C
  • Publication date:
  • Pagination:
    509, 518
  • Journal:
    JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
  • Volume:
  • Issue:
  • Status:
  • Print ISSN:
© 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Importance: Norepinephrine is currently recommended as the first-line vasopressor in septic shock; however, early vasopressin use has been proposed as an alternative. Objective: To compare the effect of early vasopressin vs norepinephrine on kidney failure in patients with septic shock. Design, Setting, and Participants: A factorial (2×2), double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted in 18 general adult intensive care units in the United Kingdom between February 2013 and May 2015, enrolling adult patients who had septic shock requiring vasopressors despite fluid resuscitation within a maximum of 6 hours after the onset of shock. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to vasopressin (titrated up to 0.06 U/min) and hydrocortisone (n = 101), vasopressin and placebo (n = 104), norepinephrine and hydrocortisone (n = 101), or norepinephrine and placebo (n = 103). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomewas kidney failure-free days during the 28-day period after randomization, measured as (1) the proportion of patients who never developed kidney failure and (2) median number of days alive and free of kidney failure for patients who did not survive, who experienced kidney failure, or both. Rates of renal replacement therapy, mortality, and serious adverse events were secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 409 patients (median age, 66 years; men, 58.2%) were included in the study, with a median time to study drug administration of 3.5 hours after diagnosis of shock. The number of survivors who never developed kidney failure was 94 of 165 patients (57.0%) in the vasopressin group and 93 of 157 patients (59.2%) in the norepinephrine group (difference, -2.3%[95%CI, -13.0% to 8.5%]). The median number of kidney failure-free days for patients who did not survive, who experienced kidney failure, or both was 9 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1 to -24) in the vasopressin group and 13 days (IQR, 1 to -25) in the norepinephrine group (difference, -4 days [95%CI, -11 to 5]). There was less use of renal replacement therapy in the vasopressin group than in the norepinephrine group (25.4% for vasopressin vs 35.3% for norepinephrine; difference, -9.9% [95%CI, -19.3% to -0.6%]). There was no significant difference in mortality rates between groups. In total, 22 of 205 patients (10.7%) had a serious adverse event in the vasopressin group vs 17 of 204 patients (8.3%) in the norepinephrine group (difference, 2.5%[95%CI, -3.3% to 8.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with septic shock, the early use of vasopressin compared with norepinephrine did not improve the number of kidney failure-free days. Although these findings do not support the use of vasopressin to replace norepinephrine as initial treatment in this situation, the confidence interval included a potential clinically important benefit for vasopressin, and larger trials may be warranted to assess this further. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ISRCTN 20769191
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Experimental & Translational Medicine
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by