UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
The effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on corticospinal excitability
  • Publication Type:
    Conference presentation
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Presentation
  • Authors:
    Lenham F, Atherton E, Bunday K, Hannah R, Rothwell J, Duffell L
  • Date:
    2017
  • Name of Conference:
    INRS
  • Conference place:
    London
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is currently used to control neurological pain and spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Continuous SCS has been shown to generate stepping-like activity [1], as well as to enable intentional lower limb movements, in patients with motor complete SCI [2]. It has been hypothesised that residual pathways are responsible for this, and repetitive stimulation may have driven neural plasticity; however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. This investigation compared the effects of transcutaneous SCS with those of functional electrical stimulation (FES) on corticospinal excitability. Trains of pulses of SCS or FES were applied over the thoracic spine or tibial nerve, respectively, in 11 subjects. Subsequent motor evoked potentials, elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation at 5 different interstimulus intervals (ISI’s), were measured from electromyography of the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles. This was repeated with single pulse SCS. Single pulses showed inhibition at an ISI of 15-20 ms, followed by facilitation at 50 ms, and a return to baseline value at 200 ms. Both SCS and FES trains did not induce inhibition from baseline values, however, SCS gave greater facilitation than both FES and single pulse SCS: FES showed no evidence of facilitation. For SCS trains, facilitation cotinued until 200 ms after the train was given. The instantaneous faciliation noted with SCS may allow intentional lower limb movements in people with complete SCI via residual pathways. This study indicates that SCS may be more effective than FES in helping SCI patients recover movement.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Dept of Med Phys & Biomedical Eng
Author
Clinical and Movement Neurosciences
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by