UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Pedunculopontine Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinsonian Disorders: A Case Series.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Article
  • Authors:
    Dayal V, Rajabian A, Jahanshahi M, Aviles-Olmos I, Cowie D, Peters A, Day B, Hyam J, Akram H, Limousin P, Hariz M, Zrinzo L, Foltynie T
  • Publication date:
    04/12/2020
  • Pagination:
    1, 8
  • Journal:
    Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    Switzerland
  • PII:
    000511978
  • Language:
    eng
  • Keywords:
    Deep brain stimulation, Freezing of gait, Parkinson’s disease, Pedunculopontine nucleus, Progressive supranuclear palsy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) has been investigated for the treatment of levodopa-refractory gait dysfunction in parkinsonian disorders, with equivocal results so far. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the clinical outcomes of PPN-DBS-treated patients at our centre and elicit any patterns that may guide future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and post-operative objective overall motor and gait subsection scores as well as patient-reported outcomes were recorded for 6 PPN-DBS-treated patients, 3 with Parkinson's disease (PD), and 3 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Electrodes were implanted unilaterally in the first 3 patients and bilaterally in the latter 3, using an MRI-guided MRI-verified technique. Stimulation was initiated at 20-30 Hz and optimized in an iterative manner. RESULTS: Unilaterally treated patients did not demonstrate significant improvements in gait questionnaires, UPDRS-III or PSPRS scores or their respective gait subsections. This contrasted with at least an initial response in bilaterally treated patients. Diurnal cycling of stimulation in a PD patient with habituation to the initial benefit reproduced substantial improvements in freezing of gait (FOG) 3 years post-operatively. Among the PSP patients, 1 with a parkinsonian subtype had a sustained improvement in FOG while another with Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) did not benefit. CONCLUSIONS: PPN-DBS remains an investigational treatment for levodopa-refractory FOG. This series corroborates some previously reported findings: bilateral stimulation may be more effective than unilateral stimulation; the response in PSP patients may depend on the disease subtype; and diurnal cycling of stimulation to overcome habituation merits further investigation.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers Show More
Author
Clinical and Movement Neurosciences
Author
Department of Neuromuscular Diseases
Author
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
Author
Clinical and Movement Neurosciences
Author
Clinical and Movement Neurosciences
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by