Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
The Manuscript as Property and as Apparatus: Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 264
  • Publication Type:
  • Authors:
    Gilbert J
  • Publisher:
    British Academy
  • Publication date:
  • Chapter number:
  • Series:
    Proceedings of the British Academy
  • Editors:
    Kugle K
  • Status:
  • Book title:
    The networked court: transdisciplinary perspectives on late medieval European court cultures
  • Keywords:
    manuscripts, Barad, Karen, Strathern, Marilyn, Actor-Network Theory, Bodley 264, Medieval Low Countries, Alexander romance, Marco Polo
This essay analyses the actual and potential value of networks embodied in the luxury manuscript that is Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 264, comparing and contrasting in detail the networks displayed in its initial production phase with those inscribed by the material reworkings it underwent as it changed hands over the course of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Two ‘posthuman’ theoretical frameworks are used, attributing agency in principle to both humans and non-humans. Anthropologist Marilyn Strathern’s account of ‘property’ shows how at each stage, the revised manuscript works both to contain networks and to condense them for new uses. Science studies scholar Karen Barad’s philosophy of ‘agential realism’ helps us to appreciate how radically different an ‘apparatus’ the manuscript becomes with each distinct production phase: not only are its networks reoriented, but the very component parts of its networks are performatively re-formed. The essay argues that these posthuman frameworks allow us to analyse how various kinds of agency and significance are attributed to or withheld from different social groups or non-human actors, thus enabling more accurate analysis of the political networks to which the manuscript’s various stages aspire.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by