UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Unintended consequences of online consultations: a qualitative study in UK primary care
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Authors:
    Turner A, Morris R, Rakhra D, Stevenson F, McDonagh L, Hamilton F, Atherton H, Farr M, Blake S, Banks J, Lasseter G, Ziebland S, Hyde E, Powell J, Horwood J
  • Publication date:
    02/2022
  • Pagination:
    e128, e137
  • Journal:
    British Journal of General Practice
  • Volume:
    72
  • Issue:
    715
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    England
  • PII:
    BJGP.2021.0426
  • Language:
    English
  • Keywords:
    Digital first primary care, digital health, health services accessibility, online consultations, qualitative research, unintended consequences
  • Notes:
    This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licences/by/4.0/).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health services are increasingly using digital tools to deliver care, and online consultations are being widely adopted in primary care settings. The intended consequences of online consultations are to increase patient access to care and increase the efficiency of care. AIM: To identify and understand the unintended consequences of online consultations in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative interview study in eight general practices using online consultation tools in South West and North West England between February 2019 and January 2020. METHOD: Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 19 patients and 18 general practice staff. RESULTS: Consequences of online consultations were identified that restricted patient access to care by making it difficult for some patients to communicate effectively with a GP and disadvantaging digitally-excluded patients. This stemmed from patient uncertainty about how their queries were dealt with, and whether practices used online consultations as their preferred method for patients to contact the practice. Consequences were identified that limited increases in practice efficiency by creating additional work, isolation, and dissatisfaction for some staff. CONCLUSION: Unintended consequences often present operational challenges that are foreseeable and partly preventable. However, these challenges must be recognised and solutions resourced sufficiently. Not everyone may benefit and local decisions will need to be made about trade-offs. Process changes tailored to local circumstances are critical to making effective use of online consultation tools. Unintended consequences also present clinical challenges that result from asynchronous communication. Online consultation tools favour simple, well-formulated information exchange that leads to diffuse relationships and a more transactional style of medicine.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Primary Care & Population Health
Author
Primary Care & Population Health
Author
Primary Care & Population Health
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by