UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Life events and treatment prognosis for depression: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Authors:
    Buckman JEJ, Saunders R, Arundell L-L, Oshinowo ID, Cohen ZD, O'Driscoll C, Barnett P, Stott J, Ambler G, Gilbody S, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Watkins E, Eley TC, Skelton M, Wiles N, Kessler D, DeRubeis RJ, Lewis G, Pilling S
  • Publisher:
    Elsevier BV
  • Publication date:
    15/02/2022
  • Pagination:
    298, 308
  • Journal:
    Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Volume:
    299
  • Status:
    Published
  • Language:
    English
  • Keywords:
    Depression, Treatment outcome, Stressful life events, Individual patient data meta-analysis, Systematic review
  • Notes:
    © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Abstract
Objective: To investigate associations between major life events and prognosis independent of treatment type: (1) after adjusting for clinical prognostic factors and socio-demographics; (2) amongst patients with depressive episodes at least six-months long; and (3) patients with a first life-time depressive episode. // Methods: Six RCTs of adults seeking treatment for depression in primary care met eligibility criteria, individual patient data (IPD) were collated from all six (n = 2858). Participants were randomized to any treatment and completed the same baseline assessment of life events, demographics and clinical prognostic factors. Two-stage random effects meta-analyses were conducted. // Results: Reporting any major life events was associated with poorer prognosis regardless of treatment type. Controlling for baseline clinical factors, socio-demographics and social support resulted in minimal residual evidence of associations between life events and treatment prognosis. However, removing factors that might mediate the relationships between life events and outcomes reporting: arguments/disputes, problem debt, violent crime, losing one's job, and three or more life events were associated with considerably worse prognoses (percentage difference in 3–4 months depressive symptoms compared to no reported life events =30.3%(95%CI: 18.4–43.3)). // Conclusions: Assessing for clinical prognostic factors, social support, and socio-demographics is likely to be more informative for prognosis than assessing self-reported recent major life events. However, clinicians might find it useful to ask about such events, and if they are still affecting the patient, consider interventions to tackle problems related to those events (e.g. employment support, mediation, or debt advice). Further investigations of the efficacy of such interventions will be important.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers Show More
Author
Dept of Statistical Science
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
Author
Division of Psychiatry
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
Author
Clinical, Edu & Hlth Psychology
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by