Objectives: This study sought to assess the association between electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) parameters and voltage from simultaneous electroanatomic mapping (EAM). Background: ECGI offers noninvasive assessment of electrophysiologic features relevant for mapping ventricular arrhythmia and its substrate, but the accuracy of ECGI in the delineation of scar is unclear. Methods: Sixteen patients with structural heart disease underwent simultaneous ECGI (CardioInsight, Medtronic) and contact EAM (CARTO, Biosense-Webster) during ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation, with 7 mapped epicardially. ECGI and EAM geometries were coregistered using anatomic landmarks. ECGI points were paired to the closest site on the EAM within 10 mm. The association between EAM voltage and ECGI features from reconstructed epicardial unipolar electrograms was assessed by mixed-effects regression models. The classification of low-voltage regions was performed using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Results: A total of 9,541 ECGI points (median: 596; interquartile range: 377-737 across patients) were paired to an EAM site. Epicardial EAM voltage was associated with ECGI features of signal fractionation and local repolarization dispersion (N = 7; P < 0.05), but they poorly classified sites with bipolar voltage of <1.5 mV or <0.5 mV thresholds (median area under the curve across patients: 0.50-0.62). No association was found between bipolar EAM voltage and low-amplitude reconstructed epicardial unipolar electrograms or ECGI-derived bipolar electrograms. Similar results were found in the combined cohort (n = 16), including endocardial EAM voltage compared to epicardial ECGI features (n = 9). Conclusions: Despite a statistically significant association between ECGI features and EAM voltage, the accuracy of the delineation of low-voltage zones was modest. This may limit ECGI use for pr-procedural substrate analysis in ventricular tachycardia ablation, but it could provide value in risk assessment for ventricular arrhythmias.