Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance enterography disease activity indices compared with a histological reference standard for adult terminal ileal Crohn's disease: experience from the METRIC trial.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
  • Authors:
    Kumar S, Parry T, Mallett S, Bhatnagar G, Plumb A, Walsh S, Scott N, Tandon R, Chong H, du Parcq J, Martinez A, Moorghen M, Rodriguez-Justo M, Halligan S, Taylor S
  • Publisher:
  • Publication date:
  • Journal:
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
  • Status:
    Published online
  • Country:
  • Print ISSN:
  • PII:
  • Language:
  • Keywords:
    Crohn’s disease, imaging, magnetic resonance enterography
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The simplified magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) index (sMARIA), London and "extended" London scoring systems are widely used in Crohn's disease (CD) to assess disease activity, although validation studies have usually been single centre, retrospective and/or used few readers. Here, we evaluated these MRE indices within a prospective multicentre, multireader diagnostic accuracy trial. METHODS: A subset of participants (newly diagnosed or suspected of relapse) recruited to the METRIC trial with available terminal ileal (TI) biopsies was included. Using pre-specified thresholds, the sensitivity and specificity of sMARIA, London and "extended" London scores for active and severe (sMARIA) TI CD were calculated using different thresholds for the histological activity index (HAI). RESULTS: We studied 111 patients (median 29 years, interquartile range 21-41, 75 newly diagnosed, 36 suspected relapse) from 7 centres, of whom 22 had no active TI CD (HAI=0), 39 mild (HAI=1), 13 moderate (HAI=2), and 37 severe CD activity (HAI=3). In total, 26 radiologists prospectively scored MRE datasets as per their usual clinical practice. Sensitivity and specificity for active disease (HAI>0) were 83% (95% confidence interval 74-90%) and 41% (23-61%) for sMARIA, 76% (67-84%) and 64% (43-80%) for the London score, and 81% (72-88%) and 41% (23-61%) for the "extended" London score, respectively. The sMARIA had 84% (69-92%) sensitivity and 53% (41-64%) specificity for severe CD. CONCLUSIONS: When tested at their proposed cut-offs in a real-world setting, sMARIA, London and "extended" London indices achieve high sensitivity for active TI disease against a histological reference standard, but specificity is low.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers Show More
Department of Imaging
Department of Imaging
Div of Medicine
Department of Imaging
Div of Medicine
Research Department of Pathology
Department of Imaging
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by