UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Comparative effect of seven prophylactic locks to prevent biofilm biomass and viability in intravenous catheters.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Article
  • Authors:
    Austin PD, Stapleton P, Elia M
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press (OUP)
  • Publication date:
    20/06/2022
  • Journal:
    Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
  • Status:
    Published online
  • Country:
    England
  • Print ISSN:
    0305-7453
  • PII:
    6611840
  • Language:
    eng
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients requiring long-term intravenous access are at risk of intraluminal catheter bloodstream infection. 'Prophylactic' locks aim to limit this risk but there is uncertainty regarding the most effective lock. OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel technique intended to replicate clinical procedures to compare the effectiveness of various 'prophylactic' locks against biofilm biomass ('biomass') formation and biofilm viability ('viability') of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis in intravenous catheters. METHODS: For 10 consecutive days 106 cfu/mL E. coli NCTC 10418 and S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 were separately cultured in single lumen 9.6 French silicone tunnelled and cuffed catheters. These were flushed with 0.9% w/v sodium chloride using a push-pause technique before and after instillation of seven 'prophylactic' locks (water, ethanol, sodium chloride, heparinized sodium chloride, citrate, taurolidine plus citrate, and taurolidine; each in triplicate) for 6 h daily. Intraluminal 'biomass' and 'viability' were quantified using crystal violet staining and flush culture, respectively. RESULTS: The reduction of 'biomass' and 'viability' depended on both agent and species. Citrate was least effective against E. coli 'viability' and 'biomass' but most effective against S. epidermidis 'viability', and taurolidine was most effective against E. coli 'biomass' and 'viability' but least effective against S. epidermidis 'viability'. 'Biomass' and 'viability' were significantly correlated in E. coli between (r = 0.997, P < 0.001) and within (r = 0.754, P = 0.001) interventions, but not in S. epidermidis. CONCLUSIONS: A novel technique found the effect of 'prophylactic' agents in reducing 'biomass' and 'viability' varied by species. The choice of agent depends on the most likely infecting organism.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Pharma & Bio Chemistry
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by