UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Authors:
    Prouskas SE, Schoonheim MM, Huiskamp M, Steenwijk MD, Gehring K, Barkhof F, de Jong BA, Sitskoorn MM, Geurts JJ, Hulst HE
  • Publisher:
    SAGE Publications
  • Publication date:
    28/06/2022
  • Journal:
    Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  • Medium:
    Print-Electronic
  • Status:
    Accepted
  • Country:
    England
  • Language:
    English
  • Keywords:
    Functional MRI, multiple sclerosis, quantitative MRI, rehabilitation, resting-state, treatment response
  • Notes:
    This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive training. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS were randomized into a 7-week attention training (n = 58, age = 48.4 ± 10.2 years) or a waiting-list control group (n = 24, age = 48.5 ± 9.4 years). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at baseline and post-intervention. Twenty-one healthy controls (HCs, age = 50.27 ± 10.15 years) were included at baseline. Responders were defined with a reliable change index of 1.64 on at least 2/6 cognitive domains. General linear models and logistic regression were applied. RESULTS: Responders (n = 36) and non-responders (n = 22) did not differ on demographics, clinical variables and baseline cognition and structural MRI. However, non-responders exhibited a higher baseline functional connectivity (FC) between the default-mode network (DMN) and the ventral attention network (VAN), compared with responders (p = 0.018) and HCs (p = 0.001). Conversely, responders exhibited no significant baseline differences in FC compared with HCs. Response to cognitive training was predicted by lower DMN-VAN FC (p = 0.004) and DMN-frontoparietal FC (p = 0.029) (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.25). CONCLUSION: An intact pre-intervention FC is associated with cognitive training responsivity in pwMS, suggesting a window of opportunity for successful cognitive interventions.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Brain Repair & Rehabilitation
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by