UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
On the accuracy of Urban Building Energy Modelling
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Authors:
    Oraiopoulos A, Howard B
  • Publisher:
    PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
  • Publication date:
    01/04/2022
  • Journal:
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • Volume:
    158
  • Article number:
    111976
  • Status:
    Published
  • Print ISSN:
    1364-0321
  • Language:
    English
  • Keywords:
    Urban Building Energy Modelling, Systematic analysis, Singular taxonomy, Calibration, Validation, Accuracy, Error, END-USE ENERGY, DATA-DRIVEN, STOCK, CITY, CONSUMPTION, SIMULATION, SCALE, DEMAND, GIS, CALIBRATION
  • Notes:
    © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Abstract
The growing demand for energy in urban areas has led to the development of a variety of methodologies for modelling energy in buildings at large scale. However, their accuracy has yet to be thoroughly reviewed. This paper presents a systematic analysis of urban building energy models, that have been validated against measured data, using a singular taxonomy based on key attributes that could influence a model's accuracy: application, scale, input data, computational method, calibration and validation methods. The analysis showed that the accuracy of urban building energy models is multi-dimensional, considered at a variety of temporal resolutions, spatial resolutions and measures of error, with the results demonstrating that there is no single key attribute that governs it. At the aggregate spatial and annual temporal resolutions, the accuracy, often reported in a single percent error value, can be as low as 1%, while for individual buildings at the annual resolution, the tails of the distribution of errors can reach 1000%. Models using non-calibrated physics-based computational methods were more likely to report overly large errors, while those employing Bayesian calibration consistently reported lower errors at the hourly temporal resolution, demonstrating the positive impact of calibration and in particular the Bayesian approach, on the models’ accuracy. Overall, the review has highlighted that more transparent and consistent reporting of accuracy is necessary and further research is essential for improving the evaluation of accuracy in modelling methodologies, if modern challenges are to be met through emerging applications such as energy systems integration and climate resilience.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Bartlett School Env, Energy & Resources
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by