UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
AI-based decision support improves reproducibility of tumor response assessment in neuro-oncology: an international multi-reader study
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Article
  • Authors:
    Vollmuth P, Foltyn M, Huang RY, Galldiks N, Petersen J, Isensee F, van den Bent MJ, Barkhof F, Park JE, Park YW, Ahn SS, Brugnara G, Meredig H, Jain R, Smits M, Pope WB, Maier-Hein K, Weller M, Wen PY, Wick W, Bendszus M
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press (OUP)
  • Publication date:
    02/08/2022
  • Pagination:
    noac189
  • Journal:
    Neuro-Oncology
  • Medium:
    Print-Electronic
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    England
  • Print ISSN:
    1522-8517
  • PII:
    6653513
  • Language:
    English
  • Keywords:
    AI-based decision support, RANO, tumor response assessment, tumor volumetry
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess whether AI-based decision support allows more reproducible and standardized assessment of treatment response on MRI in neuro-oncology as compared to manual 2-dimensional measurements of tumor burden using the RANO criteria. METHODS: A series of 30 patients (15 lower-grade gliomas, 15 glioblastoma) with availability of consecutive MRI scans was selected. The time to progression (TTP) on MRI was separately evaluated for each patient by 15 investigators over two rounds. In the 1 st round the TTP was evaluated based on the RANO-criteria, whereas in the 2 nd round the TTP was evaluated by incorporating additional information from AI-enhanced MRI-sequences depicting the longitudinal changes in tumor volumes. The agreement of the TTP-measurements between investigators was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) with confidence intervals (CI) and p-values obtained using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The CCC of TTP-measurements between investigators was 0.77 (95%CI=0.69,0.88) with RANO alone and increased to 0.91 (95%CI=0.82,0.95) with AI-based decision support (p=0.005). This effect was significantly greater (p=0.008) for patients with lower-grade gliomas (CCC=0.70 [95%CI=0.56,0.85] without vs. 0.90 [95%CI=0.76,0.95] with AI-based decision support) as compared to glioblastoma (CCC=0.83 [95%CI=0.75,0.92] without vs. 0.86 [95%CI=0.78,0.93] with AI-based decision support). Investigators with less years of experience judged the AI-based decision as more helpful (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: AI-based decision support has the potential to yield more reproducible and standardized assessment of treatment response in neuro-oncology as compared to manual 2-dimensional measurements of tumor burden, particularly in patients with lower-grade gliomas. A fully-functional version of this AI-based processing pipeline is provided as open-source (https://github.com/NeuroAI-HD/HD-GLIO-XNAT).
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Brain Repair & Rehabilitation
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by