Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
A prospective controlled trial of St. Jude versus Starr Edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Clinical Trial
  • Authors:
    Murday AJ, Hochstitzky A, Mansfield J, Miles J, Taylor B, Whitley E, Treasure T
  • Publication date:
  • Pagination:
    66, 73
  • Journal:
    Ann Thorac Surg
  • Volume:
  • Issue:
  • Status:
  • Country:
  • Print ISSN:
  • PII:
  • Language:
  • Keywords:
    Aged, Aortic Valve, Cause of Death, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Valve Diseases, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mitral Valve, Postoperative Complications, Probability, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Reoperation, Risk Assessment, Survival Rate, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of controlled trials comparing the merits of different heart valve prostheses. In this prospective randomized trial we compared Starr Edwards and St. Jude prostheses in the aortic and mitral positions. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-seven patients and 122 patients undergoing aortic and mitral valve replacement, respectively, were allocated by minimization to receive either St. Jude or Starr Edwards prostheses. Patients (2 patients were lost to follow-up) were followed up in a special clinic. Event definition, recording, and reporting were in accordance with published guidelines. RESULTS: There were no demographic differences between patients receiving the two different valve models. With the exception of infective endocarditis, we found no differences in the rates of death or complication between patients receiving a Starr Edwards prosthesis or a St. Jude prosthesis in either position. Neither were there any differences between the two valve models in either position, in terms of symptomatic relief 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in rates of complication or of symptomatic improvement between the Starr Edwards and St. Jude valve prostheses in either aortic or mitral position. Left ventricular function had such a marked effect on long-term survival that it overwhelmed any differences that might exist between different prosthetic designs. This confirms that historical comparisons are of limited value in deciding the respective merits of heart valve prostheses. The most reliable method of assessing surgical procedures is through prospective controlled trials.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Clinical Operational Research Unit
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by