UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Recursive partitioning-based preoperative risk stratification for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Journal Article
  • Authors:
    Sedrakyan A, Zhang H, Treasure T, Krumholz HM
  • Publication date:
    03/2006
  • Pagination:
    720, 724
  • Journal:
    Am Heart J
  • Volume:
    151
  • Issue:
    3
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    United States
  • PII:
    S0002-8703(05)00507-7
  • Language:
    eng
  • Keywords:
    Aged, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Artery Bypass, Decision Trees, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Statistics, Nonparametric, Stroke Volume
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) can guide decisions about prophylactic therapy. Accordingly, we sought to use tree-based methods to stratify patients into groups that will have similar risk of AF after CABG and informed decision making regarding aggressive prophylaxis of AF. METHODS: We studied 1209 consecutive patients with isolated CABG performed in 1998-1999 at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Patients with preoperative AF were excluded. Tree-based analysis was carried out to stratify patients into similar groups regarding the risk of AF. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated at each level of stratification. RESULTS: Age was the most important variable. The importance of other risk factors seemed to be different for younger and older patients. Although in the younger age group (< or =60 years) severity of coronary artery disease (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.12-3.34) followed by hypertension (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.23-2.68) were important predictors, in the older age subgroups (61-69 and > or =70 years), nothing or only ejection fraction <40% (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08-1.59) was important. In the highest-risk group, AF occurrence was 55% and, in the lowest-risk group, it was 10%. In the low-risk groups, aggressive prophylaxis may not be justified in light of the smaller number of events that would be prevented, possible adverse events, and costs. CONCLUSION: Age and variables related to heart disease severity are predictors of AF. The tree-based method may be a useful tool for clinicians who seek to determine who is more or less likely to benefit from aggressive arrhythmia prophylaxis.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Clinical Operational Research Unit
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by