Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to
your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:
Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk
Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk
Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Which prosthetic valve should we choose?
-
Publication Type:Journal article
-
Publication Sub Type:Journal Article
-
Authors:Treasure T
-
Publication date:03/1995
-
Pagination:144, 149
-
Journal:Curr Opin Cardiol
-
Volume:10
-
Issue:2
-
Status:Published
-
Country:United States
-
Print ISSN:0268-4705
-
Language:eng
-
Keywords:Animals, Bioprosthesis, Heart Valve Diseases, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Heart Valves, Humans, Swine
-
Author URL:
Abstract
In this review I concentrate on issues related to prosthetic valves themselves: their development, performance, and durability. For example, mechanical failure or tissue deterioration appear to be intrinsic properties of the valve and are therefore central to my topic, whereas the development, diagnosis, and management of endocarditis are largely independent of the type of prosthesis and are thus not dealt with here. Other outcomes such as stroke are also determined by factors other than the choice of valve, as was cogently argued in papers published during the past year. The papers on tissue valves have a common theme: they document the inevitability of tissue failure, too early for acceptable use other than in old age. The mechanical valves that have stood the test of time have done so because they do not fail.
› More search options
UCL Researchers