UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Is the potassium channel distribution in glial cells optimal for spatial buffering of potassium?
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Journal Article
  • Authors:
    Brew H, Attwell D
  • Publication date:
    11/1985
  • Pagination:
    843, 847
  • Journal:
    Biophys J
  • Volume:
    48
  • Issue:
    5
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    United States
  • Print ISSN:
    0006-3495
  • PII:
    S0006-3495(85)83843-1
  • Language:
    eng
  • Keywords:
    Animals, Buffers, Electric Conductivity, Ion Channels, Mathematics, Models, Neurological, Potassium, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells
Abstract
Glial cells in the nervous system are believed to reduce changes of extracellular potassium concentration ([K+]o), caused by neural activity, by carrying out spatial buffering of potassium. In the case of retinal glial cells (Müller cells), light-evoked increases of [K+]o within the retina are reduced by K ions flowing through the Müller cell to the vitreous fluid of the eye. We have calculated the optimal way to distribute the potassium conductance of the Müller cell to maximize spatial buffering to the vitreous fluid. The best distribution is with half the potassium conductance in the outer part of the cell, where K+ enters, and half the conductance in the vitreal endfoot, where K+ leaves the cell. This calculated distribution is very different from the actual distribution measured by Newman (1984, Nature [Lond.], 309: 155-157), where only 6% of the Müller cell conductance is in the outer cell and 94% is in the endfoot. The experimentally observed distribution gives less than a quarter of the spatial buffering that would be produced by the optimal distribution. The possible advantages of this arrangement are discussed.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Neuro, Physiology & Pharmacology
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by