UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/post_award/post_award_contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Towards a better understanding of delivering e-health systems: a systematic review using the meta-narrative method and two case studies
  • Publication Type:
    Report
  • Authors:
    Potts HWW, Keen J, Denby T, Featherstone I, Patterson D, Anderson J, Greenhalgh T, Colligan L, Bark P, Nicholls J, Shah A, Swinglehurst D, Wong G, Martin C, Blandford A
  • Publisher:
    HMSO
  • publication date:
    10/05/2011
  • Status:
    Published
  • Series name:
    NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme
  • Commisioning body:
    NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme
  • Keywords:
    delivery of health care, electronic health records, review, systematic, social sciences, social sciences, software design, decision-making, computer-assisted, coumarins, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background: The introduction of ‘e-Health’ has profound consequences for the organisation and delivery of health services. However, past studies are inconsistent as to the nature and magnitude of benefits from e-Health or how these might be realised. According to many, e-Health will make healthcare better, safer, cheaper and more integrated. Yet there is also evidence that new services can be introduced without discernible benefits and some authors criticise visions of a technological utopia. e-Health systems are complex interventions, entailing a combination of technology and organisation. They can be described as socio-technical systems. Aims/objectives: Much past research consists of implementation studies. We looked at e-Health systems that are currently in use, in order to learn from how real health services have used technology and adapted to the use of technology. Methods: We performed a systematic review using the meta-narrative approach. We then used mixed methods within a case study approach to look at two healthcare systems using information systems, including observations, interviews and formal risk management approaches (task analyses, prospective and retrospective hazards analyses). Key findings: Our review suggests electronic health records require human input to recontextualise knowledge; and that while secondary work (e.g. audit, billing) may be made more efficient by electronic records, primary clinical work may be made less efficient. The development of e-Health systems can reflect past and ongoing contingencies. There are unavoidable pressures for the localisation and fragmentation of services. There is always a co-evolution of the service and the technology, including the use of workarounds. e-Health is often promoted for its contributions to patient safety, but the evidence base for improvements is weak. Risk management methodologies can be illuminative for studying e-Health systems. However, methods are not individually reliable. Organisational boundaries remain problem areas and threaten the provision of high quality care. Organisational boundaries are a particular issue when ‘interessement’ (the process of recruiting other stakeholders to a solution) has failed, and funding models can be a particular barrier. The medico-legal context is largely untested. Conclusions: The evidence suggests that future research on e-Health systems should not presume a simple, causalist approach (technology X will reliably produce outcome Y). In-use e-Health systems are flexible and contingent. They rely on the ongoing work of healthcare staff to bridge the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. We suggest a dynamic tension between standardisation and localisation is unavoidable.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers Show More
Author
Dept of Computer Science
Author
Div of Medicine
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by