UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/post_award/post_award_contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis (ITAP) for limb salvage in 4 dogs.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Evaluation Studies
  • Authors:
    Fitzpatrick N, Smith TJ, Pendegrass CJ, Yeadon R, Ring M, Goodship AE, Blunn GW
  • Publication date:
    12/2011
  • Pagination:
    909, 925
  • Journal:
    Vet Surg
  • Volume:
    40
  • Issue:
    8
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    United States
  • Language:
    eng
  • Keywords:
    Animals, Artificial Limbs, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Feasibility Studies, Limb Salvage, Lower Extremity, Male, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Sarcoma, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report clinical application of intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis (ITAP) for limb salvage. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SAMPLE POPULATION: Client owned dogs with malignant neoplasia of the distal aspect of the limb. METHOD: Distal limb amputation allowed press-fit insertion of the ITAP into the radius (n = 3) or tibia (1). Remaining soft tissues including skin were attached directly to the ITAP. Limb stump and ITAP were protected by bandaging (1) or external skeletal fixation (3) for 5-6 weeks before exoprosthesis attachment. Measures of outcome included subjective assessments of limb function by owners and veterinarians, radiographic (4) and histologic (1) examination. RESULTS: Dermal integration with the ITAP was achieved by 3 weeks and dogs were walking in a pain-free manner by 8 weeks. One dog was administered adjunctive carboplatin chemotherapy. No evidence of local tumor recurrence occurred. In 1 dog, ITAP fracture occurred at 10 weeks and was successfully managed by ITAP replacement. Three dogs were euthanatized because of confirmed or assumed metastatic disease at 8, 12, and 17 months. Histologic examination of the ITAP-limb interface at 1 year documented osseous and dermal integration. CONCLUSION: Implantation of ITAP to the distal limb of dogs is feasible and can result in favorable functional outcomes. Biological integration of osseous and dermal tissues with ITAP is reliable and robust.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Department of Materials & Tissue
Author
Dept of Med Phys & Biomedical Eng
Author
Department of Materials & Tissue
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by