UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/post_award/post_award_contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
A comparison of a similarity-based and a feature-based 2-D-3-D registration method for neurointerventional use
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Article
  • Authors:
    McLaughlin RA, Hipwell J, Hawkes DJ, Noble JA, Byrne JV, Cox TC
  • Publication date:
    08/2005
  • Pagination:
    1058, 1066
  • Journal:
    IEEE TRANS MED IMAGING
  • Volume:
    24
  • Issue:
    278-0062 (Print), 8
  • Keywords:
    Algorithms, Arteriovenous Malformations, Artificial Intelligence, Cluster Analysis, Comparative Study, diagnosis, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Intracranial Aneurysm, methods, Neuronavigation, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Reproducibility of Results, Research Support, Non-U.S.Gov't, Sensitivity and Specificity, Subtraction Technique
  • Addresses:
    Wolfson Medical Vision Laboratory, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 0BU, UK. r.mclaughlin@ieee.org
  • Notes:
    DA - 20050811
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2-D)-to-three-dimensional (3-D) registration can improve visualization which may aid minimally invasive neurointerventions. Using clinical and phantom studies, two state-of-the-art approaches to rigid registration are compared quantitatively: an intensity-based algorithm using the gradient difference similarity measure; and an iterative closest point (ICP)-based algorithm. The gradient difference approach was found to be more accurate, with an average registration accuracy of 1.7 mm for clinical data, compared to the ICP-based algorithm with an average accuracy of 2.8 mm. In phantom studies, the ICP-based algorithm proved more reliable, but with more complicated clinical data, the gradient difference algorithm was more robust. Average computation time for the ICP-based algorithm was 20 s per registration, compared with 14 min and 50 s for the gradient difference algorithm
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Dept of Med Phys & Biomedical Eng
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by