UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Measurement of liver blood flow: a review
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Article
  • Authors:
    Seifalian AM, Stansby GP, Hobbs KE, Hawkes DJ, Colchester AC
  • Publication date:
    09/1991
  • Pagination:
    171, 186
  • Journal:
    HPB SURG
  • Volume:
    4
  • Issue:
    894-8569 (Print), 3
  • Keywords:
    Angiography, blood, classification, diagnostic use, drug therapy, Dye Dilution Technique, Humans, Lasers, Liver, Liver Circulation, London, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, methods, Microspheres, physiology, Radionuclide Angiography, radionuclide imaging, Research Support, Non-U.S.Gov't, surgery, therapy, Ultrasonics, ultrasonography
  • Addresses:
    Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK
  • Notes:
    DA - 19911220
Abstract
The study of hepatic haemodynamics is of importance in understanding both hepatic physiology and disease processes as well as assessing the effects of portosystemic shunting and liver transplantation. The liver has the most complicated circulation of any organ and many physiological and pathological processes can affect it. This review surveys the methods available for assessing liver blood flow, examines the different parameters being measured and outlines problems of applicability and interpretation for each technique. The classification of these techniques is to some extent arbitrary and several so called "different" methods may share certain common principles. The methods reviewed have been classified into two groups (Table 1): those primarily reflecting flow through discrete vessels or to the whole organ and those used to assess local microcirculatory blood flow. All techniques have their advantages and disadvantages and in some situations a combination may provide the most information. In addition, because of the many factors affecting liver blood flow and sinusoidal perfusion, readings in a single subject may vary depending on positioning, recent food intake, anxiety, anaesthesia and drug therapy. This must be borne in mind if different studies are to be meaningfully compared
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Dept of Med Phys & Biomedical Eng
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by