UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data grouped in the sections named "Externally Awarded" or "Internally Disbursed" (shown on the profile page) to your Research Finance Administrator. Your can find your Research Finance Administrator at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/research/rs-contacts.php by entering your department
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Can fully automated detection of corticospinal tract damage be used in stroke patients?
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Journal Article
  • Authors:
    Kou N, Park C-H, Seghier ML, Leff AP, Ward NS
  • Publication date:
    11/06/2013
  • Pagination:
    2242, 2245
  • Journal:
    Neurology
  • Volume:
    80
  • Issue:
    24
  • Status:
    Published
  • Country:
    United States
  • PII:
    WNL.0b013e318296e977
  • Language:
    eng
  • Keywords:
    Adult, Aged, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Female, Hand Strength, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Pyramidal Tracts, Stroke
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We compared manual infarct definition, which is time-consuming and open to bias, with an automated abnormal tissue detection method in measuring corticospinal tract-infarct overlap volumes in chronic stroke patients to help predict motor outcome. METHODS: Using diffusion tensor imaging and probabilistic tractography, 4 corticospinal tracts from the primary motor cortex, dorsal and ventral premotor cortices, and supplementary motor area to the ipsilateral lower pons were reconstructed in 23 healthy controls. Tract-infarct overlap volume of each of the 4 corticospinal tracts was determined by overlapping the patients' lesions onto the control tract templates, using both manually and automatically defined infarcts in 51 patients. Correlations with upper limb motor impairment were assessed and both methods were directly compared using intraclass correlations (ICC). RESULTS: Greater impairment was seen in patients with greater corticospinal tract-infarct overlap with either method (rmanual range = 0.32-0.46; rautomated range = 0.42-0.57). Consistency between manual and automated methods was good to excellent for all 4 corticospinal tracts (ICC range = 0.71-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that automated infarct identification performs equally as well as a manual method in quantifying corticospinal tract-infarct overlap following stroke.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Researchers
Author
Brain Repair & Rehabilitation
Author
Clinical and Movement Neurosciences
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by