UCL  IRIS
Institutional Research Information Service
UCL Logo
Please report any queries concerning the funding data shown on the profile page to:

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/secure/research/post_award
Please report any queries concerning the student data shown on the profile page to:

Email: portico-services@ucl.ac.uk

Help Desk: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ras/portico/helpdesk
Publication Detail
Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas facilities: A comparative assessment of different scenarios
  • Publication Type:
    Journal article
  • Publication Sub Type:
    Article
  • Authors:
    Ekins P, Vanner R, Firebrace J
  • Publisher:
    ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
  • Publication date:
    06/2006
  • Pagination:
    420, 438
  • Journal:
    J ENVIRON MANAGE
  • Volume:
    79
  • Issue:
    4
  • Print ISSN:
    0301-4797
  • Language:
    EN
  • Keywords:
    offshore oil and gas industry, decommissioning options, comparative assessment
  • Addresses:
    Policy Studies Inst
    London
    W1W 6UP
    England
Abstract
A material and energy flow analysis, with corresponding financial flows, was carried out for different decommissioning scenarios for the different elements of an offshore oil and gas structure. A comparative assessment was made of the non-financial (especially environmental) outcomes of the different scenarios, with the reference scenario being to leave all structures in situ, while other scenarios envisaged leaving them on the seabed or removing them to shore for recycling and disposal. The costs of each scenario, when compared with the reference scenario, give an implicit valuation of the non-financial outcomes (e.g. environmental improvements), should that scenario be adopted by society. The paper concludes that it is not clear that the removal of the topsides and jackets of large steel structures to shore, as currently required by regulations, is environmentally justified; that concrete structures should certainly be left in place; and that leaving footings, cuttings and pipelines in place, with subsequent monitoring, would also be justified unless very large values were placed by society on a clear seabed and trawling access. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Publication data is maintained in RPS. Visit https://rps.ucl.ac.uk
 More search options
UCL Authors
UCL Energy Institute
University College London - Gower Street - London - WC1E 6BT Tel:+44 (0)20 7679 2000

© UCL 1999–2011

Search by